Dive Gear with Full Warranties & Fast Free Shipping

The oxygen sensors in analyzers and rebreathers are complex devices, but fundamentally it's helpful to think of them as oxygen powered fuel cells. They operate on a chemical reaction, -- an oxygen sensor is a lead-oxygen battery consisting of a lead anode, an oxygen cathode made up of gold and a weak acid liquid electrolyte, mostly potassium hydroxide. A great many factors affect this chemical reaction, some of the most important being pressure, temperature, humidity and of course the presence of oxygen. However, the factors that affect the chemical reaction as much, or more, are those factors inherent in the manufacturing process itself. The chemical reaction began the moment the cell was assembled, continued at predictable pace while the new cell sat in the sealed bag, and vigorously accelerates when the bag is opened and the cell is exposed to normal atmosphere.

How rebreather divers use and maintain their oxygen sensors and how divers analyzing their Nitrox mix for content use and maintain their oxygen sensors are two completely different situations.

Cells used in rebreathers are exposed to pressures of oxygen much greater than normally encountered in analyzing gas. As they age they become 'non-linear', meaning they are perfectly accurate for some conditions and very inaccurate for certain other conditions and this can have serious consequences for rebreather divers. Rebreather manufacturers recommend replacing the cells annually, long before they can become non-linear. The widely accepted absolute maximum useful lifespan of cells in rebreather applications is 18 months. No manufacturer recommends doing things to cells like vacuum packing, freezing, refrigerating, storing in inert gas because they have not tested what happens to cells when these things are done. They can tell you that based on their expert knowledge of the cells, these life-extending steps can and probably will cause minor improvements in the life of some components in the cell while damaging or having no effect on other components in the cell. They are almost certain to cause the cell to go non-linear faster than normal, to become unstable, affect the cell response time curves, and on and on.

So real world for a rebreather diver....

1. Case one: take three cells, install them in the rebreather, and leave them there. At the end of 12 months, throw the perfectly good sensors away and install new ones. Keep in mind, these things are not precision devices; they are high failure items that have a long history of quality control issues with amazing variations from lot to lot. The really paranoid rebreather divers install three sensors from three different lots and stagger the installation over a period of time such as two or three months. In my opinion, and those of the manufacturers, this is the best course of action to follow.
   
   
2. Case two: another rebreather diver installs and removes the cells after each dive trip... carefully doing their favorite ritual to store the sensors to extend their life. At the end of twelve months the rebreather diver removes the sensors that have been handled in a manner that literally frightens the rebreather manufacturers. Their handling produces at best a perfectly good sensor or at worst a sensor that has any number of bizarre and unknown or unpredictable behaviors, and having removed them throws them away. Hopefully the diver survives case two, there have been a few accidents where handling of the cells have been implicated or even declared the proximate cause of the accident.
   
   
3. Case Three: See case one or two, except the rebreather manufacturers extremely strong warnings regarding cell replacement times are further ignored and the cells are continued to be used until failure. Hopefully the diver survives case three; even more fatalities are directly linked to old cells.
   
   

The experiences of the rebreather community have proven time and again that the life of the '36 month in air 10mv oxygen sensor' in rebreather applications is 12 to 18 months and with heavy use it's probably less.... (I do 150 hours a year and replace my perfectly good sensors every 8 to 10 months). It would seem most reasonable rebreather divers at this point would just follow manufacturer's recommendations, but there are always those who feel the manufacturers have a 'hidden agenda' in the frequent replacement of oxygen sensors and choose their own path.

Now let's visit a completely different situation, the use of oxygen sensors in analyzers. In this situation, we are almost always analyzing a known gas, i.e. we have an expectation regarding what's in the cylinder and are using the analyzer to confirm it. In this case do whatever you like to the sensor; if you think it will extend the life of the sensor that's fine... it's harmless. As long as you understand that the moment the analysis of the contents varies from expected by more than 1% you realize you do NOT know what's in the cylinder and take appropriate action. Oh, and don't use a sensor that's been mishandled (i.e. vacuum packed, frozen, refrigerated, stored in inert gas, older than 36 months, over heated, desiccated, etc) to determine the oxygen content of an unknown gas, ever.

So how would I feel about using some kind of unproven life extension technique on oxygen sensors in cylinder contents analyzers? (That includes 'sensor saver caps' and similar devices.) Well, recall the previous remarks about the huge number of factors that affect sensors? Many of the most important ones have nothing to do with environmental factors, they have to do with variations in the manufacturing process. Two important factors being the cleanliness of the lead anode and the exact composition of electrolyte; these vary significantly from batch to batch and sensor to sensor. They vary so much that the sensors have a little electronic circuit in them that factory calibrates in each sensor to produce the final target output mv range. These factors have FAR more effect on the life of the sensor than any dubious benefit from after market sensor life extension techniques. Just because someone used a life extension technique on the sensor and that sensor 'lasted longer' is meaningless. There are too many factors at work to have any chance of knowing what effect, if any, the life extension technique had on the life of the sensor. To be frank, a harmless waste of time if you are using the analyzer to confirm cylinder contents are as expected and otherwise a risky practice.

Heat has the most impact on the life of oxygen sensors because sensor life can be significantly shortened by excessive exposure to heat. Keep rebreathers out of the sun both pre-dive and post-dive; an easy solution is just to cover the area where the sensors are mounted with a light colored towel. Likewise, contents analyzers should not be left out in the sun of a boat deck or in a hot car. Treat your rebreather or contents analyzer with respect, keep it at temperatures you are comfortable in (if you are too hot or too cold, so are the sensors).

In summary, answers to frequently questions about sensor handling:

• Vacuum pack your sensor? No. Rupture membrane, create bubbles in electrolyte.
• Freeze your sensor? NO! Hello... we are relying on these devices to keep us alive.
• Refrigerate your sensor? Depends on the brand, but no for the Teledyne brand (10C min) and no would be best practice for all brands.
• Store your sensor in inert gas? Maybe, but best practice would be no due to risk of affecting moisture content (i.e. drying out) of sensor. Also, some concerns about 'wakeup time' after storage.
• Seal it in bag or with cap? Harmless, but probably would not make a significant difference in practice. Remember, some components are aging regardless of being deprived of oxygen.

One final thought, extending the life of an oxygen sensor is a 'risk vs. reward' decision. Typical life of an analyzer sensor is somewhere between 24 and 48 months (I've seen plenty of them last 60 months and longer) and it costs about $70. If you assume the after market processes add one year to the life, you saved a few dollars and incurred an unknown but significant risk.